You shouldn't support either of them, they will fail eventually since amateurs on Youtube and Twitch do a much better job than they do. They have diguised this corruption as 'social justice', but it's just a fascade designed to attract weak-minded extremists so that their magazines can survive. So these journalists, at Kotaku, Polygon and IGN, are morally corrupt frauds. You do the math, the reasons for this are very simple. Small European developers get ♥♥♥♥ on for not having enough ethnic npcs, whilst Nintendo and Sony get a free pass on these 'issues'. If these journalists actually had any moral principles, they would be consistent with applying their moral criteria. desperately spewing divisive political garbage designed to fragment gamers, in order for them to keep a small number of extremist readers and thus justify doing a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ job of games journalism. IGN is just like Kotaku and Polygon, i.e. They are both terrible, although IGN is marginally worse since it's more political and GameSpot still has connections to proper games journalists.

Call of duty cold war review gamespot